![]() ![]() , though another report said that upgrading Malwarebytes was also reported to have blocked our download server.According to Rising: Malware.Heuristic!ET#86% (rdm+).According to Yomi Hunter: Trojan.Shelma!6FgIvXQ353M.According to Yandex: Trojan.Rozena!HzkpdhLd3Ls.According to SentinelOne: DFI - Suspicious PE.According to Rising: (RDML:L2kuAr0kZuIw8c+l3U6LAA).According to Antiy-AVL: Trojan/Win32.Swrort.According to Malwarebytes: Malware.Generic.622351592.According to McAfee: GenericRXAA-FA!B3BB91AD96F2 (McAfee have since confirmed this was a false positive, and removed it).According to Antiy-AVL: Trojan/Generic.ASMalwS.347CCB5.According to F-Secure and Avira: Trojan.TR/Meterpreter.wzwbz.Here's a list of accusations we have observed ourselves, or had Whether it's because of anything we are doing so we alsoĭon't know what – if anything – we can do to stop them. But we don't know why these reports happen we don't even know Legitimate, signed builds of PuTTY are free of malware and safe to Top-level summary: We have every reason to believe that all ![]() Most release builds of the PuTTY tools in the last few years have beenĪccused by one or more virus checker of being malware of some kind. PuTTY seems to have a persistent problem with virus-scanning software. Priority: high: This should be fixed in the next release. Wishlist summary: PuTTY is persistently misreported as malwareĬlass: semi-bug: This might or might not be a bug, depending on your precise definition of what a bug is. PuTTY semi-bug false-positive-malware PuTTY semi-bug false-positive-malware ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |